1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
BeeMarkets vs Charleston Investments: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BeeMarkets (BEEMARKETS PTY LTD) and Charleston Investments (Charleston Investments Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- BeeMarkets 6D Score
- 2.0
- Charleston Investments 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
BeeMarkets and Charleston Investments are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, BeeMarkets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Charleston Investments holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | BeeMarkets | Charleston Investments | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: BeeMarkets vs Charleston Investments
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | BeeMarkets | Charleston Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | BEEMARKETS PTY LTD | Charleston Investments Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 'GATEWAY' L 36 SE 59 1 MACQUARIE PL SYDNEY NSW 2000 AUSTRALIA | 33, Edith Cavell Street 11324, Port-Louis, Mauritius Second Floor, Ebene House, Hotel Avenue, 33 Cybercity, Ebene, 72201. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Commodities | Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Indices, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare BeeMarkets and Charleston Investments against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: BeeMarkets vs Charleston Investments
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BeeMarkets or Charleston Investments?
Both BeeMarkets and Charleston Investments hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, BeeMarkets maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Charleston Investments maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BeeMarkets and Charleston Investments?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BeeMarkets records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Charleston Investments at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do BeeMarkets and Charleston Investments differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
BeeMarkets lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Charleston Investments lists Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Indices, Commodities with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BeeMarkets or Charleston Investments?
BeeMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Charleston Investments carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.