Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

APME FX vs RoboMarkets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APME FX (APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd) and RoboMarkets (RoboMarkets Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

APME FX 6D Score
6.0
RoboMarkets 6D Score
3.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: apme-fx-vs-robomarkets

APME FX outranks RoboMarkets by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 3.0)

On supervisory breadth, APME FX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RoboMarkets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAPME FXRoboMarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.03.0+3.0APME FX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.03.0+3.0APME FX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0APME FX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.03.0+3.0APME FX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.03.0+3.0APME FX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: APME FX vs RoboMarkets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: APME FX vs RoboMarkets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between APME FX and RoboMarkets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAPME FXRoboMarkets
Primary Legal NameAPME FX TRADING EUROPE LtdRoboMarkets Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
CYSEC: #335/17CONSOB: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressSpyrou Kyprianou 25,Floor 1/Office 103, 3070 , Limassol, CyprusKorunní 2569/108, Vinohrady, 101 00, Prague
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesOptions, futures, swaps, forwardsCryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Energies
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare APME FX and RoboMarkets against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: APME FX vs RoboMarkets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APME FX or RoboMarkets?

APME FX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, APME FX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CONSOB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RoboMarkets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APME FX and RoboMarkets?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APME FX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with RoboMarkets at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do APME FX and RoboMarkets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

APME FX lists Options, futures, swaps, forwards with execution software [MT5], while RoboMarkets lists Cryptocurrencies, Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Energies with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APME FX or RoboMarkets?

APME FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RoboMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

APME FX vs RoboMarkets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk