Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

APME FX vs Lariox: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APME FX (APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd) and Lariox (Lariox Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

APME FX 6D Score
6.0
Lariox 6D Score
1.4
Regulated Licences
2 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: apme-fx-vs-lariox

APME FX outranks Lariox by +4.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.4)

On supervisory breadth, APME FX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Lariox holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAPME FXLarioxScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.01.4+4.6APME FX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.01.4+4.6APME FX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0APME FX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.01.4+4.6APME FX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.01.4+4.6APME FX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: APME FX vs Lariox

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: APME FX vs Lariox
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between APME FX and Lariox.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAPME FXLariox
Primary Legal NameAPME FX TRADING EUROPE LtdLariox Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
CYSEC: #335/17CONSOB: Not supplied
None on file
Registered Domicile / AddressSpyrou Kyprianou 25,Floor 1/Office 103, 3070 , Limassol, CyprusSuite 305, Griffith Corporate Centre, Beachmont P.O. BOX 1510, Kingstown, St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesOptions, futures, swaps, forwardsIndices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5MT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare APME FX and Lariox against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: APME FX vs Lariox

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APME FX or Lariox?

APME FX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, APME FX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CONSOB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Lariox maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APME FX and Lariox?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APME FX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Lariox at 1.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do APME FX and Lariox differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

APME FX lists Options, futures, swaps, forwards with execution software [MT5], while Lariox lists Indices, Forex, Stocks, Futures, Metals, Commodities with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APME FX or Lariox?

APME FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Lariox carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

APME FX vs Lariox (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk