Skip to content
VolSurface Desk
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

APME FX vs Jalatama: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of APME FX (APME FX TRADING EUROPE Ltd) and Jalatama (Jalatama Artha Berjangka) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers

APME FX 6D Score
6.0
Jalatama 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: apme-fx-vs-jalatama

APME FX outranks Jalatama by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, APME FX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Jalatama holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAPME FXJalatamaScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0APME FX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: APME FX vs Jalatama

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: APME FX vs Jalatama
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between APME FX and Jalatama.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAPME FXJalatama
Primary Legal NameAPME FX TRADING EUROPE LtdJalatama Artha Berjangka
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
CYSEC: #335/17CONSOB: Not supplied
BAPPEBTI: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressSpyrou Kyprianou 25,Floor 1/Office 103, 3070 , Limassol, CyprusSoho Capital Lt. 36 Suite 3606, Jl Letjend S. Parman Kav 28, Tanjung Duren Selatan, Grogol Petamburan, Jakarta Barat 11470 Gedung Menara Rajawali,Lt.23 Jl. DR.Ide Anak Agung Gde Kawasan Mega Kuningan - Jakarta 12950
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesOptions, futures, swaps, forwardsIndices, Forex, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishIndonesian, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare APME FX and Jalatama against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: APME FX vs Jalatama

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: APME FX or Jalatama?

APME FX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, APME FX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CONSOB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Jalatama maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (BAPPEBTI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between APME FX and Jalatama?

In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), APME FX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Jalatama at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do APME FX and Jalatama differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

APME FX lists Options, futures, swaps, forwards with execution software [MT5], while Jalatama lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: APME FX or Jalatama?

APME FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Jalatama carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

APME FX vs Jalatama (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | VolSurface Desk