1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AFB FX vs MTS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AFB FX (AFB FX) and MTS (MTS Capital Co.,Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Futures, options and derivatives providers
- AFB FX 6D Score
- 1.0
- MTS 6D Score
- 1.3
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
MTS outranks AFB FX by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.3 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, AFB FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MTS holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AFB FX | MTS | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.3 | +0.3 | MTS |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.3 | +0.3 | MTS |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.3 | +0.3 | MTS |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.3 | +0.3 | MTS |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AFB FX vs MTS
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AFB FX | MTS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | AFB FX | MTS Capital Co.,Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Office 3501, 5th floor, Maximos Plaza Tower 3, Maximos Michaelidi Street, Limassol 3106, Cyprus | 10,12,14, 3rd Floor, Sapsin Road, Wang Burapha Phirom Sub-district, Pranakorn District, Bangkok, 10200 442/1 G floor Baromrajochonnee Road Arun Amarin Sub-District Bangkok Noi District Bangkok 10700 Room no: 118, 1st Floor, No.98 Moo. 4 Na Di Sub-District, Mueang Samut Sakhon District, Samut Sakhon, 74000 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Futures, Metals | Precious metals, Futures, Energies, Currencies, Indices |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Arabic, Chinese, English, Russian | English, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AFB FX and MTS against other regulated peers in our futures, options and derivatives providers slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AFB FX vs MTS
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AFB FX or MTS?
Both AFB FX and MTS hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, AFB FX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MTS maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AFB FX and MTS?
In VolSurface Desk's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AFB FX records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with MTS at 1.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.3, Brand: 1.3, Market Influence: 1.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do AFB FX and MTS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AFB FX lists Futures, Metals with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MTS lists Precious metals, Futures, Energies, Currencies, Indices with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AFB FX or MTS?
AFB FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MTS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.